The sports category has moved to a new website.

Kenyans react to company policy banning Val's Day gift drop-offs at workplace

Kenyans react after a company releases a workplace policy banning Valentine's Day gift delivery at the workplace.

An AI image of Valentine's day gifts

An internal email advising against the exchange of Valentine’s gifts within a certain company has sparked debates among employees and on social media platforms.

The memo, which surfaced ahead of Valentine's Day, has ignited discussions regarding workplace policies and the celebration of romantic occasions in professional settings.

The circulated email, purportedly from company management, instructs employees not to bring Valentine’s gifts into the workplace.


While Valentine's Day is traditionally associated with expressions of love and affection, the company's decision aims to mitigate potential discomfort and distractions that such exchanges may cause, especially to single individuals.

The romantic ambiance typical of Valentine’s Day can inadvertently create pressure on employees, particularly those who may not have romantic partners or prefer to keep their personal lives separate from their professional environment.

Following the dissemination of the internal memo, discussions about workplace policies and the significance of Valentine’s Day have emerged on social media platforms.


Many users have shared their perspectives on whether such directives are appropriate within professional settings.

While some individuals support the company's decision, citing the need to maintain professionalism and avoid potential conflicts or discomfort among colleagues, others criticize it as overly restrictive.

Some argue that Valentine’s Day celebrations in the workplace can promote camaraderie and positive morale if handled with sensitivity and inclusivity.

The directive to communicate the policy to loved ones has also drawn attention, with some questioning the necessity of involving external parties in internal workplace matters.


The requirement reflects the company's expectation for employees to adhere to the policy within and outside working hours, raising questions about the boundaries between professional and personal domains.

Despite the discussions sparked by the memo, the identity of the company remains undisclosed.

While some speculate about the reasons behind the policy, others await further clarification from company officials regarding the decision-making process and its implications for workplace culture.


Unblock notifications in browser settings.

Eyewitness? Submit your stories now via social or: