The sports category has moved to a new website.
ADVERTISEMENT

Raila’s plan to move to the Supreme Court suffers major blow

New developments make it difficult to successfully challenge President Uhuru Kenyatta's win.

It has now emerged that the next petition to be filed at the Supreme Court will be heard and determined under a new legal framework after the controversial election laws have been enacted.

The election laws pushed by the Jubilee team set very high standards for the annulment of a presidential petition.

On Monday, President Uhuru Kenyatta claimed that he failed to sign the controversial laws after receiving complaints from different stakeholders.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Some argued that I was changing the Rules of Engagement half-way through the game. Others argued to change the electoral law ahead of the 26th election is to privilege myself over the other competitors. And because law must be founded on reasoned national consensus, I listened to these voices. I did not sign the new Bill into Law,” Kenyatta stated.

However, the President failed to mention that he had also not returned the bill to Parliament, and that his inaction automatically made it law 14 days after it was passed by legislators.

The 14 days elapsed on Friday 27 but is pending publication in the Kenya Gazette before it can be operationalized.

Gazzettement must be done by Friday this week, being the expiry of seven days from the day it became law.

The implication is that any petition challenging the results of the repeat election will be heard after the new law has been operationalized.

ADVERTISEMENT

The IEBC on Tuesday gazzetted Uhuru Kenyatta’s election as President-elect, opening the seven day window for petitions to be filed at the Supreme Court.

One of the significant provisions in the controversial law is Section 83 which states that an election will not be annulled on the basis of discrepancies in the forms used or by actions of rogue election officials.

Although the laws have since been challenged in a court petition filed by activist Okiya Omtatah, the opposition team is reportedly cautious of moving to the Supreme Court under such a tough legal framework.

JOIN OUR PULSE COMMUNITY!

Unblock notifications in browser settings.
ADVERTISEMENT

Eyewitness? Submit your stories now via social or:

Email: news@pulselive.co.ke

Recommended articles

Kenyans react as Shakur the Cop shares his plight after taking part in demos

Kenyans react as Shakur the Cop shares his plight after taking part in demos

Ruto, Mudavadi & Gachagua reveal what Kenyans should expect in new cabinet

Ruto, Mudavadi & Gachagua reveal what Kenyans should expect in new cabinet

Ruto breaks silence on mutilated bodies found in Mukuru kwa Njenga

Ruto breaks silence on mutilated bodies found in Mukuru kwa Njenga

Mukuru Kwa Njenga horror: woman’s horrifying dream, more mutilated bodies & standoff

Mukuru Kwa Njenga horror: woman’s horrifying dream, more mutilated bodies & standoff

More mutilated bodies retrieved from Mukuru Kwa Njenga as pressure mounts on Ruto

More mutilated bodies retrieved from Mukuru Kwa Njenga as pressure mounts on Ruto

UDA MP claims his life is in danger after defying Ruto & on Finance Bill 2024

UDA MP claims his life is in danger after defying Ruto & on Finance Bill 2024

Citizen Assembly: Nadia Mukami goes after Karen Nyamu, dresses down female politicians

Citizen Assembly: Nadia Mukami goes after Karen Nyamu, dresses down female politicians

Raila reacts to discovery of mutilated bodies in Mukuru kwa Njenga as focus turns to Ruto

Raila reacts to discovery of mutilated bodies in Mukuru kwa Njenga as focus turns to Ruto

Luxury hotel brand takes action against Farah Maalim amid pressure from Gen Z

Luxury hotel brand takes action against Farah Maalim amid pressure from Gen Z

ADVERTISEMENT