Pulse logo
Pulse Region

High Court issues ruling on legality of housing levy

One of the key issue addressed by the court was whether the housing levy violated constitutional rights.
Boma Yangu: Step by step guide on how to register and secure affordable housing
Boma Yangu: Step by step guide on how to register and secure affordable housing
  • The court ruled that there was adequate public participation during the legislative process
  • The housing levy was found not to violate constitutional provisions related to equality, property rights, and socio-economic rights
  • The court declared that the housing levy aligns with the government’s duty to provide adequate housing for citizens

The High Court in Nairobi has delivered a ruling, affirming the legality of the houisng levy, in the affordable Housing Act, 2024.

The decision, delivered on Tuesday, 22 October, 2024, provides a green light for the government to continue implementing its affordable housing programme.

Adequate public participation

Recommended For You
Lifestyle
2025-03-18T12:55:11+00:00
The dynamics of in-law relationships in Kenya have evolved, with urban and rural settings experiencing different levels of transformation. While rural areas still uphold many traditional expectations, urban settings have embraced modern lifestyles
A mother and daughter-in-law hanging out together
Lifestyle
2025-03-18T12:40:12+00:00
Rachel Ruto is no stranger to making bold yet elegant fashion statements, but during the state visit of the Dutch royals on March 18, 2025, it wasn’t just her outfit that stood out—it was her shoes. The Kenyan First Lady stepped out in a pair of brown suede block heels adorned with a gold emblem.
The Sh83K shoes that completed Rachel Ruto’s State Visit look

The three-judge bench, comprising Justices Olga Sewe, John Chigiti, and Josephine Mongare, concluded that there was adequate public participation during the legislative process.

The judges emphasised that the public was given sufficient opportunity to express their views on the housing levy before it was passed into law.

In their ruling, the court stated, "The evidence presented indicates that the relevant stakeholders and members of the public were adequately engaged in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution."

READ: From 2018 to 2024: A look at Kenya’s Affordable Housing agenda

This ruling comes after six petitions were filed challenging the housing levy, with petitioners arguing that the public was not properly consulted and that the law violated several constitutional provisions.

Constitutionality of the levy

Another key issue addressed by the court was whether the housing levy violated constitutional rights.

The petitioners had raised concerns that the levy infringed upon Articles 27, 40, and 43 of the Constitution, which deal with equality, property rights, and socio-economic rights, respectively.

However, the court found that the Affordable Housing Act, 2024, did not breach these constitutional provisions.

In their ruling, the judges noted that the levy was a necessary part of the government’s efforts to address the housing deficit in the country.

"The housing levy, as structured, does not violate any of the rights protected under Articles 27, 40, or 43. Instead, it aligns with the government’s duty to provide adequate housing for its citizens," the bench declared.

READ: Proposed tough consequences of defaulting rent for affordable housing units

Impact on devolution

The petitioners had also argued that the Affordable Housing Act encroached on devolved functions, particularly in housing and urban development, which fall under county jurisdiction.

However, the court dismissed this argument, ruling that the Act does not claw back on devolution.

Subscribe to receive daily news updates.